from twilight to sunlight: John 4:1-10

4:1 Now when Jesus learned that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus was making and baptizing more disciples than John 2 (although Jesus himself did not baptize, but only his disciples), 3 he left Judea and departed again for Galilee. 4 And he had to pass through Samaria. 5 So he came to a town of Samaria called Sychar, near the field that Jacob had given to his son Joseph. 6 Jacob’s well was there; so Jesus, wearied as he was from his journey, was sitting beside the well. It was about the sixth hour.

7 A woman from Samaria came to draw water. Jesus said to her, “Give me a drink.” 8 (For his disciples had gone away into the city to buy food.) 9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “How is it that you, a Jew, ask for a drink from me, a woman of Samaria?” (For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.) 10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is that is saying to you, ‘Give me a drink,’ you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water.”

Listen to Sunday’s sermon below or download it here.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

looking for Calvin and Hobbes

My summer reading list is a bit eclectic.  The way I go about selecting books for the summer is a kind of chaotic science.  First, I look at the books on my “to read” book shelf.  Then I look at my wish list in Amazon, followed by a quick glance through my ongoing book list on my phone, computer, and sticky notes around my office.  Once I have all these lists in front of me, I begin putting books in categories: theological, practical, historical, cultural, and just-for-fun (this last category is for books outside of my normal reading sphere that helps to broaden creativity).

Looking for Calvin and Hobbes: The unconventional story of Bill Watterson and His Revolutionary Comic Strip fits into the latter category.

I didn’t necessarily grow up reading Calvin and Hobbes.  I remember it.  But I wasn’t an avid reader.  I just didn’t read the paper much as a kid.  In the rare case that I did, it was most certainly the comic section though.

I remember having a slight interest in comics because of my grandpa Thompson.  He was an amateur artist, and before he died he taught me a few things about drawing.  We always worked from the comic page of the newspaper.  So, my interest was peaked when I first saw this book.

To be honest, I don’t remember how I came across this book.  Maybe one of my friends told me about it, or maybe I saw it mentioned on Facebook, Twitter, or some such social network.  At any rate, I’m glad I read it.  I thoroughly enjoyed it.

When Nevin Martell set out to write this biographical book about Watterson and his famous strip, he wasn’t sure if he would actually be able to accomplish his goal.  According to Martell, “Though Watterson’s influences are somewhat easy to ascertain, the man himself is an enigma.  During the ten years that Calvin and Hobbes was drawn and was entrancing millions and millions of readers around the world, the man behind it tried to remain as anonymous as possible.”

Watterson’s intentional obscurity has to do with the fact that he is a purest of sorts.  He abhorred the idea of celebrity.  In a rare interview, he told Gene Williams, a sports editor, that although “I know most people dream of being famous or being a celebrity … I’ve found it to be a nuisance all the way around.  There’s very little of it I enjoy.  You become a cartoonist all your life, all day.  It’s no longer a job.  You are defined by your work.  You suddenly have no private time.”  These words were not an exercise in false humility for Watterson.  His hatred for popularity is clearly demonstrated in the way he lives his life.

Even though many might consider him a curmudgeon, Watterson’s cultural analysis of American celebrity is right on target:  “As a culture, we embrace people for no reason other than the fact that they have a job that puts them in a position of recognizability.  People who have no other virtues necessarily are somehow made into these things that we devour … There’s something very strange about our fascination with other people’s lives that I don’t think is entirely healthy.” As a result of his view, Watterson allowed very little in the way of merchandise.  Thus, we don’t see many, if any, Calvin and Hobbes toys or nicknacks.  And just for the record, the decals on car windows are rip offs.

As a side note, I’m fairly certain there is a sermon in that last quote somewhere.  Watterson is no Christian, at least there is no indication that he is.  But the answer to his problem is found on a hill called Golgotha.  Remember the words of Paul in 1 Corinthians.  He pointed out that, “Jews ask for signs and Greeks search for wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified.”  The only thing that will fix the human fascination with celebrity is the cross.

No doubt, Watterson is an obscure character.  But it is his quirkiness that makes his one of the best comic strips of all times.

Calvin and Hobbes is not for the lazy reader who wants to be spoon fed jokes, or who has no imagination.  This comic strip is based on the assumption that the reader plays a part in making the storyline come alive.  Speaking about Watterson, Martell explains that, “He wanted you to think about what happened in the slender white spaces between the frames of the strip and beyond its ending.  No matter what magic Watterson concocted, there was rarely a moment when the strip felt forced or, worse yet, meaningless.”

Watterson’s creative genius was that he didn’t fill in all the blanks.  In fact, the basis of Calvin and Hobbes was a dual reality.  Is Hobbes a real tiger, or is he just a figment of Calvin’s imagination?  To Calvin, he was real.  To Calvin’s parents, he was a stuffed animal.  Watterson’s postmodern approach allowed both realities to be true.  “I don’t think of Hobbes as a doll that miraculously comes to life when Calvin’s around.  Neither do I think of Hobbes as the product of Calvin’s imagination.  Calvin sees Hobbes one way, and everyone else sees Hobbes another way.  I show two versions of reality, and each makes complete sense to the participant who sees it,” explained Watterson.

Nevin Martell does a remarkable job throughout this book telling the story of Bill Watterson without ever having actually talked to the man.  He explains his background and his approach, which deepens the reader’s appreciation for the strip, even if, like myself, the reader isn’t all that familiar with Calvin and Hobbes.

Watterson was not just a run of the mill cartoonist.  He took his job very serious.  He saw cartoons as an art form.  And although his approach makes him a bit odd in the comic strip world, it made his strip one of the best.

Personally, I can see a little bit of Calvin in all four of my boys.  As they play with stuffed animals, Legos, and toy cars, they drift off into another world.  I can also see some Calvin in me as well.  It isn’t difficult for me to get lost in the white spaces between the frames as I imagine playing in Calvin’s reality.

How twilight should have ended

I saw this on a friend’s facebook page and I just couldn’t resist posting it.

a total eclipse of the heart

Eclipse, the third movie in the Twilight series, came out today.

In a post this morning, Marian Kassian offers some reasons why this bizarre movie about vampires and werewolves has captivated the hearts and minds of young teenage girls (and I would add, young to middle-aged women).  You can read her full article here.

Based on the first two movies, Marian points out a few danger signs.  She says, “I am perplexed by Christians who uphold Twilight as a desirable model for dating or relationships. I don’t understand why believing mothers fail to discern the good from the bad, and fail to discuss the deception in the Twilight message with their daughters. Bella had an absentee mother. And sadly, that’s the case with many young women today.”

Parents, if you allow your teenagers to see this movie, you should definitely take a few minutes to think through the dangers listed below.  And all you ladies who sat through the Twilight marathon last night, I would strongly suggest you take the time to read the entire article.

Danger Signs

If Bella were my daughter, several alarm bells would be going off in my head about her relationship with Edward. I would not approve. Regardless of how “in love” she felt, I would argue that this romance was not good for her, and would not end well. It would ultimately be bad and not good for her soul. There are some very clear danger signs in their relationship that I would flag:

1. Bad Boy Attraction
2. Shared Dark Secrets
3. “Us” versus “Them” Mentality
4. Isolation and Seclusion
5. Mismatched Interests and Values
6. Neediness and Obsession
7. Rationalization and Justification
8. Failure to Seek & Heed Input

the day Adoption became a past tense verb in our house

Today will forever be remembered in the Thompson household.  From now on, we will celebrate June 29th as a second birthday.  This morning Amy and I received four new birth certificates.  What makes this day even more special is that it is our wedding anniversary as well.  Fourteen years ago, Amy became a Thompson.

Now, Fuller David, Sophia Ann, Josiah Michael, and Elijah Robert are officially Thompsons.  They now have a Midwestern heritage, complete with Hoosier basketball and corn on the cob. And we can’t wait to take them back home this summer so they can meet their grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and long time friends.

chasing your dreams to death: John 3:22-36

22 After this Jesus and his disciples went into the Judean countryside, and he remained there with them and was baptizing. 23 John also was baptizing at Aenon near Salim, because water was plentiful there, and people were coming and being baptized 24 (for John had not yet been put in prison).

25 Now a discussion arose between some of John’s disciples and a Jew over purification. 26 And they came to John and said to him, “Rabbi, he who was with you across the Jordan, to whom you bore witness—look, he is baptizing, and all are going to him.” 27 John answered, “A person cannot receive even one thing unless it is given him from heaven. 28 You yourselves bear me witness, that I said, ‘I am not the Christ, but I have been sent before him.’ 29 The one who has the bride is the bridegroom. The friend of the bridegroom, who stands and hears him, rejoices greatly at the bridegroom’s voice. Therefore this joy of mine is now complete. 30 He must increase, but I must decrease.”

31 He who comes from above is above all. He who is of the earth belongs to the earth and speaks in an earthly way. He who comes from heaven is above all. 32 He bears witness to what he has seen and heard, yet no one receives his testimony. 33 Whoever receives his testimony sets his seal to this, that God is true. 34 For he whom God has sent utters the words of God, for he gives the Spirit without measure. 35 The Father loves the Son and has given all things into his hand. 36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.

You can listen to the sermon below or download it here.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.


Dad Life

Dad Life from Church on the Move on Vimeo.

summer reading: the life of God in the soul of man

This summer I am reading a book a month with a few young guys in the church.  A few weeks ago we read and discussed The Life of God in the Soul of Man by Henry Scougal.

This book, written in the seventeenth century, was originally a long letter to a friend who had lost the faith.  Since its publication, it has become very influential and highly regarded.  In the words of the great evangelist of the First Great Awakening, George Whitefield, “I never knew what true religion was till God sent me this excellent treatise.”

Scougal, a Scottish minister, had a passion to rescue religion from mere formalism and duty.  At a very young age (he died of consumption on June 13, 1678 at the age of 28), he understood that the Christian life was about the desires of the heart.  It is not enough to simply go through the motions.  To follow Christ is to delight in Him.  J. I. Packer calls this “the inwardness and supernaturalness of biblical godliness.”

The books is divided into three main sections.

The first section investigates the true nature of religion.  “True religion,” according to Scougal, “is a union of the soul with God, a real participation of the divine nature, the very image of God drawn upon the soul, or, in the apostle’s phrase, ‘it is Christ formed within us.’”  Furthermore, “The love which a pious man bears to God and goodness, is not so much by virtue of a command enjoining him so to do, as by a new nature instructing and prompting him to it…those religious exercises are the proper emanations of the Divine life, the natural employment of the new-born soul.”

When there is only duty and no delight, the result is “a cold and spiritless compliance.”

The second section of the book addresses the benefits of true religion.  Scougal explains “the excellency of divine love,” and how that love is expressed through godly virtues.

The last section deals with the difficulties involved in living out the Christian life.  On the one hand, we must be aware of  sin, because “it is the highest folly to regulate our actions by any other standard than that by which they must be judged.”  Therefore, “Let us never look upon any sin as light and inconsiderable.”  We must resist the temptation to sin, by considering the evils they will draw on us, by keeping a constant watch over ourselves, and by always examining our actions.

On the other hand, we must restrain ourselves when it comes to good things by living a disciplined life.  “Christian prudence will teach us to abstain from gratifications that are not simply unlawful, and that not only that we may secure our innocence, which would be in continual hazard, if we should strain our liberty to the utmost point; but also, that hereby we may weaken the forces of nature, and teach our appetites to obey,” argues Scougal.

In recent day, delight is often emphasized to the exclusion of duty, relationship to the exclusion of religion.  Scougal does not fall prey to a truncated view of the Christian life.  Scougal argues that, “We must proceed to such exercises as have a more immediate tendency to excite and awaken the divine life.”  In other words, duty breeds delight.

Every Christian travels through desserts.  Everyone has experienced periods in life when the desire to read the Bible, or attend worship, or sing praise songs, or spend time in prayer is non-existent.  The answer is not to idly wait until the feeling returns.  Religious activities are designed by God to draw us to himself.  The feeling of delight will not return apart from the God-ordained structures spelled out in in His Word.

Although I realize Scougal’s goal was not to say everything on the subject, the book would be enhanced by a greater discussion of Christ and community.  For the most part, Scougal speaks in terms of God, but fails to emphasize the centrality of Christ (Eph 1:3-11; Col 1:15-20; 2:3).  And for the most part, a discussion of how the life of God should be expressed and lived out in the body of Christ is missing (Eph 1:22-23; 4:15-17; Hebrews 10:24-25; 1Jn 1:7).

In conclusion, I would highly recommend reading this little gem of a book.  It is not very long, but it is not the kind of book that should be read quickly.  Even more, the language will probably take some getting used to.  It may be difficult to read at first, but it is well worth the effort.

If you are struggling with your faith, this book will rekindle your passion for God.

If you tend, like most Christians, toward Pharisaical self-righteousness, Scougal will give you the challenge you need.

But even if you are not struggling, The Life of God in the Soul of Man will deepen your relationship with God.

parenting beyond the symptoms, part 2

A few weeks ago I posted part one of this blog.  And although I didn’t get the second part written on time, here it is now.  Better late than never, right?

In part one, I discussed the main issue we deal with as parents—sin.  As the Proverb says, “Folly is bound up in the heart of a child” (22:15a).

What is the main goal of parenting?  Again, Proverbs provides the way of wisdom: “Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it” (22:6).

There is a difference between training and raising a child

Raising a child involves things like providing food and shelter and the necessities of life.  To raise a child simply means that you made sure they had everything they needed.

Training has a much deeper connotation.

To train means to cause some kind of change in the one being trained.  As a parent, your responsibility is to train your child to behave in certain ways (to respect authority, to obey your voice, to pick up after themselves, to say thank you and please).

Just like an athlete trains for a big event, the big event you are training your child for is adulthood.  The goal of the training is maturity.  You are to constantly teach your child about a certain path, or a certain way to live—training them in the way they should go.  The Lord has given you the task of forming and shaping them into godly men and women.

And the promise is—even when he is old he will not depart from it.

This is where the Proverb gets dicey.  Many parents have diligently attempted to follow the first half of this Proverb, only to experience the heart wrenching reality of a rebellious child.

I have often heard this verse explained away as a saying that is generally true.  I’m sure I’ve said this myself a time or two.  In part, it is correct.  Proverbs 22:6 is a general principle.  It certainly does not guarantee that if you do all the right things, then your child will grow up as a perfect little angel.

But what if the book of Proverbs is more than just pithy sayings and life principles?

What if the way of wisdom is more than just making wise decisions, managing your money properly, and staying out of trouble?

Indeed, Proverbs agrees with the rest of the Bible—the main character is Jesus Christ (Luke 24:27).

The way of wisdom is ultimately the Way, the Truth, and the Life.  As Jesus himself said, “The queen of the South will rise up at the judgment with this generation and condemn it, for she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon, and behold, something greater than Solomon is here” (Matt 12:42).

This means that Jesus is the eschatological fulfillment of the way of wisdom.  Jesus was trained in the way he should go, increasing in wisdom and in stature and in favor with God and man, and he did not depart from it (Luke 2:52).

Thus, the way of wisdom, the training up of a child, is a Galilean path to a vicious cross and an empty tomb.  It is the Gospel.

Gospel training rescues us from the danger of raising self-righteous pharisees.

If all we do is modify behavior and teach good morals, we have failed in our God-given parental responsibility.  We must train our children to follow the one Child who came to deliver his people from their sins.

In the midst of their obedience, we must tell our children of the only one truly obedient Child.  And as we pull out the rod to lovingly deal with disobedience, we must teach them to trust in the One who endured an infinite spanking in their place.

sexual obesity

In the June/July edition of First Things, Mary Eberstadt “warns that America is growing fat on pornography.”  Entitled, “The Weight of Smut,” the article begins by comparing the American obesity problem with porn (you can read a portion online, but I would encourage you to purchase the journal in order to read the entire article).

As the impressively depressing cover story “America the Obese” in the May issue of The Atlantic serves to remind us all, the weight-gain epidemic in the United States and the rest of the West is indeed widespread, deleterious, and unhealthy—which is why it is so frequently remarked on, and an object of such universal public concern. But while we’re on the subject of bad habits that can turn unwitting kids into unhappy adults, how about that other epidemic out there that is far more likely to make their future lives miserable than carrying those extra pounds ever will? That would be the emerging social phenomenon of what can appropriately be called “sexual obesity”: the widespread gorging on pornographic imagery that is also deleterious and unhealthy, though far less remarked on than that other epidemic—and nowhere near an object of universal public concern. That complacency may now be changing. The term sexual obesity comes from Mary Ann Layden, a psychiatrist who runs the Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology Program at the University of Pennsylvania. She sees the victims of Internet-pornography consumption in her practice, day in and day out. She also knows what most do not: Quietly, patiently, and irrefutably, an empirical record of the harms of sexual obesity is being assembled piecemeal via the combined efforts of psychologists, sociologists, addiction specialists, psychiatrists, and other authorities.

The proof is in the pudding.  According to a recent study, young people who have been exposed to porn are more likely to:

  • Have multiple lifetime sexual partners
  • Have had more than one sexual partner in the last three months
  • Have used alcohol or other substances at their last sexual encounter
  • Have tried risky forms of sex
  • Engage in forced sex
  • Be sexual offenders

In a different study (2008) focused on undergraduate and graduate students:

  • More than two-thirds of men—and one out of every ten women in the sample—viewed pornography more than once a month

Another study showed that first-year college students using sexually explicit material exhibited the following:

  • Increased tolerance, and therefore, more bizarre and esoteric material
  • Increased risk of body-image problems

There are endless stats on porn, but I think you get the picture.  Eberstadt argues against what she calls “three of the most influential and reckless” untruths.

  1. Pornography use is a private matter. “Among individuals who have ever been married, those who say they’ve seen an X-rated movie in the last year are 25 percent more likely to be divorced and 13 percent less likely to identify themselves as ‘very happy’ with life in general.”
  2. Pornography use is a guy thing.  It only bothers women. Porn is not just looking at bad pictures.  It is like a drug in which habituation and tolerance set in.  “Just as heavy drinkers and drug users over time require higher doses of substances to achieve the same effect, so apparently do some chronic users of pornography come to require harder-core and edgier material.”  As Sean Thomas from the London Spectator admitted, “Internet pornography revealed to me that I had an unquantifiable variety of sexual fantasies and quirks and that the process of satisfying these desires online only led to more interest.”
  3. It’s only Pictures of consenting adults. The argument is self-evident.

Eberstadt concludes,

There is nothing alarmist whatsoever in arguing that we ought to be alarmed about the first generation raised on Internet pornography. In speaking on college campuses about other issues lately, I have been struck by how many students—usually, though not only, girls—have come up afterward and confided their view that pornography use is the number-one factor warping relations between the sexes these days. I have also heard at least a few boys confide that it’s hard to find girls on campus who have not themselves been drawn in to some form of the pornographic subculture—via “sexting,” say, or in the effort to please previous boyfriends, or in the deliberately provocative pictures of themselves on Facebook and elsewhere.

The reason porn is such a grave threat is because it is concealed.  It is very difficult to hide a drug addiction, but pornography is a different story.  Porn doesn’t make you visibly inebriated, nor is it difficult to get.  A man no longer needs to run to the mail box to hide his subscription to Hustler.  In fact, why get a subscription to a one dimensional woman when hundreds of women are just a click away?

Don’t lie to yourself.

Even more, don’t assume “my child doesn’t do that,” or “my husband would never look at porn.”

Every Christian computer should have some way to filter the smut and keep you accountable.

Here are two accountability programs I highly recommend.  Both programs do the same thing.  They monitor your internet browser and send email reports to your accountability partner listing any questionable sites you have visited.

If you are not willing to have accountability, giving some lame excuse about internet speed or too much hassle or whatever, then you are either already addicted, or you are setting yourself up to be.